Konami makes a huge mistake on this. Ace cards usually have tons of support (look utopia, stardust etc). By giving them for free is like persuading players to buy the new boxes that contain support to these cards. So you have happy players and also you give them an extra reason to buy new boxes. But no, the greed of this company makes me sad.
As it seems you never played the deck, right?
This card is a "destruction sword" card. So it has synergy with the destruction sword memories, it is searchable and can interrupt you opponents plays with its effect or even act as a lighting vortex. On the other hand OG buster blader is basically a big vanilla.
I need help and advise
I set both my security orb and an Econ,to protect my petit moth from being destroyed: mind you it was against lv10 weevil who has no spell or traps to stop the activation.
Please tell me why my security orb didn't activate on attack declaration but my set econ did? I'm trying to pull out my Perfect Great Moth combo but I can't.
I need help please
Hi, I can only guess. But maybe you did not summon BEAWD correctly from hand first? If that is the case, you should not be able to summon him from gy - thus no target for Master.
Lightsworns are interdimensional mercenaries who help people in need. Some were corrupted by the Dark Worlds not Dark Lords. The Dark Lord story line is unrelated.
Effect negation is the best form of negation since most decks/strategies are based on monsters. Not to mention the easiest way of winning is through monster attacks, unless you run a weird burn/deck out/exodia etc deck. Just look how popular have become in the past cards like photon bouncer, witchcrafter verre, fiendish chain, buster blader, forbidden chalice, ultimate providence, gorgonic etc etc
fire king island + jiaotu
activate jiato's effect special summon the lvl 5 and another yang zing tuner
destroy jiaotu summon zefraxi.
synchro into baxia.
use baxia second effect to re-summon a tuner and an appropriate yang zing for a disruptive synchro on opponents turn
Ty for your help. This helped me understand some more of the face up/down mechanics and I learned that you can tribute face down monsters with attributes, but that’s it.
"it" does refer to the monster. If you wanted the card to do what you want it to it would have to say " but it can attack its opponent directly". Since the equip spell is controlled by the owner, the monster would only be able to attack the opponent of the equip spell.
Like another guy said use it to stop whatever is disrupting your OTK. As in an OTK deck if you get disrupted in your main combo, you probably lost anyways so the LP cost isn’t too relevant.
