Why would Elemental Hero Neos Knight Vs. Amzoness Swords Woman lead to damage?

This just happened to me i just flat out attacked with neos night at a base atk of 2500 and the vagabound had swords woman out in attack position. I just flat out took 1000 damage. And it was the challenge that he starts with 1000 LP so thought I had him (-__-#). I hate this MotherF***er. I think this ruling should be changed. It states on the card of Swords Woman:"Your opponent takes all Battle Damage you would have taken from a battle involving this card." Now Neo Knight States in the text the very last sentence: "Your opponent takes no Battle Damage from attacks involving this card." So if my opponent takes no battle damage from this card. It should trump swords womans effect because hers states "Your opponent takes all Battle Damage you WOULD HAVE TAKEN from a battle involving this card." No damage was supposed to be dealt to begind with soooo... wtf.. I agree with the person who posted this. But if its applied whatever i just must be missing the logic behind it then. I thought i had him.

Your opponent will not take damage from Neos Knight, is not the same as preventing Swordswoman from doing damage to you. Completely unrelated abilities.

Pretty sure that cause of Amzoness Swords Woman's effect you still take the damage of the battle done between the two monster even tho your opponent doesnt take any battle to thier life point cause of Hero neos effect. I dunno about the 800 more damage maybe there was something you missed.

Yes I've also noticed there's a programming error with WoD, it can reduce ATK below zero.

Your opponent takes no battle damage from Neos Knight, not sure about the other numbers though.