See... No meta deck for new pack. So I gonna spend my 3k gems looking for 2 m... (4page) | PvP Best Decks & Tier List [Mar 15] - YuGiOh! Duel Links

<< Anonymous(j)

Anoymous

People complaining that others "abuse the meta" doesn't make it true or have any real meaning. I can get a bunch of people to say my dog is a cat, but it's actually still a dog, regardless of what people say! Anyways, wtf does "abusing the meta" even mean? People use good cards? That's a shocker!

<< Anonymous

Here is how id explain abusing the meta.When you have no common sense or will to create your own deck. Not when you want to win rather, when you feel its appropriate to carbon copy a deck to feel better about yourself because you legitimately can't win without doing so. If your to tell me no one does this than I have no further words...

<< Anonymous

Secondly chill out with your passive agressive bull 🔥. It doesnt strengthen your point and I never acted that way toward you.

<< Anonymous(j)

Anoymous

Ban all viable cards imo

<< Anonymous

Naicha

You are really missing the entire point. Typical of normal users who stumbles upon an XY problem. If you don't want to analyze and situate the given if we are to interpret the original question "Out of "n" number of cards, producing an attempted "Y-solution" of how can I achieve victory, then it is. However, the original "X-problem" means that YOU ARE ALL META SLAVES AND ARE ALL TRASH

<< Anonymous

Bobby

🔥 you noon don't talk to Naicha like that, you meta slave, can't even have the guts to post your own name, don't woory Naicha I got your back :D

<< Anonymous(Bobby)

Anoymous

why is the person who is naicha's friend or naicha under a different name telling me this lol

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

I think they are different person but both anti-meta nazi's, probably 🔥 couple's I'm guessing? no need to take them seriously, especially Naicha, he seems like nerd and kinda wierd@@

<< Anonymous(j)

Anoymous

Sure "j". I accept your analysis. However, I would still choose the original path of discouraging meta as pointed out by you. Come on people, I am sure u guys can come out different new decks than being meta slaves. Be inventive!

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

Yeah the original thread creator obviously sounds like a typical meta slave. "No meta deck for new pack. So I gonna spend my 3k gems looking for 2 more kozuki... "

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

Agreed, the OP should go for some original cards like Axe Raider. Something like Gozuki is completely worthless. Be original and use cards that have a lot of potential like the legendary Axe Raider! It's a great card, the meta is just holding it back because there are too many uncreative noobs around.

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

Yeah. Axe raider is normal card, use with warrior boost cards and otc for etc. Many ways to build a deck if u actually think about it.

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

Sarcastic bastards who can't debate on finding new grounds. Lol. Have to restort on underhand way. Oh well.

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

OtC isn't very good these days and there are better things to use it with than a 1700 beater. Besides, there's a 1800 N Warrior in the new Mini Box with better defense as well, the only difference being their attributes, which really doesn't make any difference. Axe Raider is just awful no matter how much you try to make it seem like it's a godly card lmao

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

If u guys don't agreed with naicha, j or other anons, just debate the proper way! Coming up with sacarcism posts wouldn't make you guys sounds right or legitimate either. Cowards..

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

normally when someone types lol they are actually pissed but try to hide their fury by typing lol to make others think you're not triggered?
nice try but we can see right through you, you anti-meta nazi

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

Huh lol

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

I don't care, call me a meta slave,my priority is to reach kog,then I play with non-meta decks,that is what you will see at kog rank, they use a lot of new decks to try out bc you don't worry about rank down,so if that is the paradise that you want then maybe you should reach kog, or is it simply bc you can't and instead you blame us for using meta
why don't u win first then play around with decks

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

Y are u always referencing things from kog perspective? Kog maybe impt to u, maybe not to others? We are facing metas in casual and ladders. It's not fun seeing metas everywhere.

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

technically we can't debate with this Naicha weirdo ,no one understands a word he says

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

if you dont like seeing meta stuff then games with any sort of competitive functions arent for you. single player games are the way to go

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

not fun in the fact that you lose to them a lot? or the fact that sick of seeing same decks over and over?
fine I can help you out I'll stop using meta and use a non-meta deck then, but good luck convincing the rest of the other players

<< Anonymous

Naicha

failing to understand the XY theory again, do I need to imply that you metal slaves need me to educate you all on the XY solotion in order to let you all understand the the theory "n" amount of cards will be the evidence that meta should be nerfed?

<< Anonymous(Naicha )

Anoymous

ok we had enough of you already,from beginning to now is all this xy 🔥 and some nerdy phrases, could you please 🔥?

<< Anonymous(Naicha )

Anoymous

No, I completely understand as I am experiencing this first hand. The metal band Metallica has taken me as a hostage and is forcing me to be their slaves. They told me if I find the solOtion (emphasis on the capital O) then they would set me free, but I can't seem to figure out what they're talking about. Can someone help me? I used to like Metallica until they forced me to be their slave...

<< Anonymous

Naicha

failing to understand the XY theory again, do I need to imply that you meta slaves need me to educate you all on the XY solution in order to let you all understand the the theory "n" amount of cards will be the evidence that meta should be nerfed?

<< Anonymous(Naicha)

Anoymous

ur trying a little too hard mr. nacho

<< Anonymous(j)

Naicha

First of all, I wish to thank all my doppelganger anons for keeping up with me all this time. I wish you all good riddance!

To "J": Because I believe you replied to me a couple of times, I am glad to say in response, that I am agreeing to your dialectical view of "meta". Similar (syntax-wise) to concepts such as "beauty" or "evil", I can only surmise that it would displease me a lot if..

<< Anonymous(Naicha)

Naicha

someone decided to tell me something about "non-beauty", for instance.

meta = meta 1
counter-meta = meta 2

It seems that I have given you an impression that I am taking the side of meta 1 discouragement. I am NOT. I am aware of its ontological impasse. If I am subservient enough, I'll admit it was "a particular thinking process" I was pointing at, but still I have no claims of such thing either.

<< Anonymous(Naicha)

Naicha

Let me elaborate again the critical points of my earlier comments, in the hopes of attaining better contextuality for both of us.

1) My first critical post was the "Ilustration of XY problem". This should give an excellent impression of my PURPOSE, the INTENTION of the purpose, and the SUBJECT of intention. In response to an angered anon replying to a user named "Bobby" and the original anon, ..