None of u guys give enough pointers or the balls to debate Naicha properly. Failure to do so, u guys stoop low to 🔥 him. Shame on u guys! One of u agreed that you don't like see so many red eyes meta either but can't help it coz u wanna win. That's a sign of a major weakness for you simply give up to challenges. That's a pity!
Thank you for considering my words. To be fair, I really don't think they have to argue with me further, since for them it may come close to a lose-lose situation. It's either,
1) they have understood my point, or
2) they did not.
How would they respond, since what I have merely illustrated was "hypothetically labeling them as what kind of player they are". This is where..
their counter-argument should start "ideally". Can they argue that, "no, I'm not a typical person, I'm an advanced or maybe an expert player!". In short, there is very little less room for debate since I ONLY ILLUSTRATED THINGS via xy problem scenario, nothing more, nothing less. It doesn't even relate to the ethics of winning, so properly replying to me with decent pointers won't really work.
sorry everyone, me and my 🔥ed anal, i mean anon friend(actually the same guy but wanted to look like someone agrees with my x=y y=z z=my 🔥 stinks) has caused everyone a lot of trouble please forgive us
it's even more pathetic that you can't comprehend that a meta will always be there. also, "meta slave" is the dumbest thing i've ever heard of and i've only ever heard it used in this community. not that that's surprising though lol.
Look on the brighter side! You being a slave, just means you are overly devoted and obedient to your object of interest. There's nothing wrong with it!
The idea that you can even play non-meta is paradoxical, in other words, it can not exist. Putting aside the literal definition of a meta (most effective tactic available), and considering the colloquial term, in relation to duel links (the most commonly used decks), you may realise that if you are winning you are either countering the meta or playing the meta. If you are countering the meta you..
simply playing another form of meta ie: The meta- counter. Which, in itself, creates a new meta. <br>
<br>
The idea that a meta doesnt encourage creativity is very subjective. A meta was created via creativity, so on one hand the meta is the pinnacle of creative expression, on the other hand the meta is simply an elitists way of saying "I need to win and I dont want to put in the effort...
to find my own way to do it". In my opinion we should never discourage a meta, because then we are subsequently discouraging creativity. But, we should never abuse a meta because then we are subsequently encouraging laziness. <br>
<br
Do not complain about the meta unless it is truly game breaking because it will change. As time has shown us, it always changes.
🔥 you worm, useless piece of cr*p! do you not realize x=y t=z z=f people using meta decks = slaves!!! they suk!!! I do not use meta that is why i discourage it!! me and the other mysterious anon gang up on you people and you get salty?? wanna know how us 2 feel when we can't rank up because so many meta's are roaming about??? bottom line, meta's are unhealthy and should be banned!!! arr!!
Hmm u said meta creativity is subjective but yet u said we shd never discourage meta coz its discouraging creativity? How can u discourage something that is "subjective"?
You r right that meta encourage laziness. Therefore we are discouraging laziness and aiding creativeness for the community. If we see problems, we shd speak up, letting nature do its work are just excuses for being lazy.
Firstly I am not salty my dude
To address the point that an anon made, subjectivety simply stated just means that there are multiple ways of viewing something. I demonstrated both ways ( lazy and creative). I never said meta creativity was subjective, rather I said that how you view a meta is subjective. Thanks for being civil sir :).
The meta can not disappear(there will always be a best or top 3). So we must look at I in terms related to that fact. So we either encourage building a meta, but not abusing, or we do not encourage the meta, in which case the meta will still be prevalent we just are opting not to use it. And so with this in mind we must concede to the idea of a meta. But, we still have the ability to change it...
Hmm u said meta creativity is subjective but yet u said we shd never discourage meta coz its discouraging creativity? How can u discourage something that is "subjective"?
Firstly yes you can abuse the meta. The frequent use of red eyes is a prime example of people abusing the meta, too many people complain about everyone abusing the meta, for you to say you cant abuse the meta is "lol" worthy.