I don't think Amazoness are op, but yeah you guys are pretty much right about this: ``When a deck is meta for too long even after new boxes`` the deck is likely to be touched, yep. But it's done just to promote deck diversity, one the other hand I really disagree with the ban of onslaught, the card that SHOULD be limited is amazoness princess.
---Princess limited to 2
---Econ limited to 2
Problem solved
yeah, it'd be way better to nerf Princess since its the core of the deck, if princess would be limited to 2 onslaught won't be a problem since they have already nerfed restart.
At 2x onslaught has a 10% to be in your opening hand. If you have a 12% chance drawing it so let's change things up let's say princess at 1 like you say that's a 15% chance to open with it. And a 18% chance to draw it? Not including stall or draw cards that will stall the game until you have it in position. It will not change the game, they will still be op.
I say Onslaught @ 1 would be enough. Princess is really only good now for that +1, her second effect isn't as useful as it used to be with Baby Tiger...so it should be fine @ 3 as long as Onslaught goes to 1. E-Con should also be limited since it's still a game stealer (basically the same reason Brain Control was banned in TCG).
Anonymous
Saladfingers
