You have waaay too many cards. I'd remove the 2 Golden Ladybugs, Remove Trap, Swamp Mirrorer, 1 Draining Shield, 1 Enemy Controller, 1 Wall of Disruption, and Metalmorph. I know some of those are hard decisions, but you're less likely to draw what you need with a bloated deck. Also try using the Restart skill instead, since my suggestions would probably stop Balance from working well, if at all.
If these are the cards you have access to I would drop the 3rd Rose Lover and Bergamot, both ladybugs, remove trap, swamp mirror, and metalmorph. Keep one or both (personal pref) WoD and both Draining Shields (don't know why you would take them out).
Essentially you can pick between the AMA or the second WoD. I would take the WoD because you aren't aiming to OTK and Archer counters your main . However, my list would look like this:
Draining Shield is a very defensive card. At least WoD could completely cripple your opponent and let you turn things around, on top of buying you a turn. Maybe I'm just offense oriented... but the longer you take, the more likely your opponent will pull off their combo, like getting SSA out or something. Giving Sylvans more turns is always bad, especially without chalice.
I didn't say to not play WoD, in fact I said I to keep one or both...so I still don't know why you would just take out Draining Shield. But thats moot, because what is WoD going to do to SSA? Chain, remove, remove additional, pass. Return to field with regular attack. Sylvans probably aren't going to care either because they summoned Herm/Guard with rose and don't care. WoD is a surprise card
Additionally they do two different things. Draining shield gets you back in the game if you're down LP and can't use effects. WoD is meant to protect a monster or punish a full board. It's also a waste to use it on one monster, and any good player will play around a second WoD.
You're asking why I would take both Draining Shield out, and I'm explaining that it is because it would be more beneficial to use WoD instead of Draining Shield most of the time. Instead of planing for a situation where you're low on LP and would rather use Draining Shield over WoD... I'd rather not get into that situation and win sooner. A successful WoD could allow you to win.
If the SSA user has more than 1 monster, he can't banish both of them, in that case he is left with a weakened monster, which you could use AMA and take advantage of it. And while the Rose Lover-summoned monster is immune to traps, WoD will work against the other monsters... leaving a 0 ATK monster or two for you to capitalize on next turn. Do you understand my philosophy now?
Oh wait, the SSA user can then banish the weakened monster on your turn... Well, at least that is one less monster to deal with on your turn. With Draining Shield the SSA user has no reason to banish his monsters at least two turns in a row.
Uh no, they either banish the level 4 on their turn or use the second effect for what's probably a whale and just destroy the attack target. Then they sit on the whale during your turn and EP remove it if it's up. If not it doesn't matter because they just destroy whatever on your turn. And you effectively wasted wall d. Good for you.
Again though, you're still arguing for a card I said to include in his build...so I don't understand the point. I don't play it because I would rather chain floodgate to the summon of the whale and ignore it.