Let's make this the longest thread ever in this site :D
π₯hole, butthole, sounds different but all the same~
Expelling π₯ and anal π₯ is in their game~
Flush down the toilet, clean yourself after you poo~
If you don't, the one who's truly π₯ is you~~~
Dude u seemed to imply only you are right and the rest are scrubs. Hmm what make your opinion standout? To be fair, in a highly competitive game play environment, only the "best" cards are used for optimised play, "replaceable" isn't an option.
That proves you dont know how to play it, you use it to end the duel, not π₯ π₯s, yes the 2nd effect can π₯ π₯s in many cases, but that's not the point, you take their monster to attack for game.
Attacking for game is for π₯s you need to π₯ all there monsters 1rst to really let them know you're the better player so srh is better because it kills monster I hope your small brain understands that
Oh come on. It's a better card, sure you can replace it but you'll lose more often because you don't have it. The difference between a KOG deck and a Plat deck comes down to the best cards. It's like I build a GK deck and don't run 3 soul exchanges, sure it's still powerful but it's categorically weaker than the optimised version.
The point was that it is the best option available, but it is a replaceable card. You already admitted that so I don't see why you're continuing to act as if someone called SRH trash or something lol. Saying it's replaceable doesn't mean it's not the best option for its role, it just means you can replace it.
He econ you back and you die. If you compare econ to srh like this then every trap are π₯ because there are counter trap. Compare only one dimension then all monsters are π₯, most attack win by attacking each other.
Let me makes example, you use econ to steal their monster to attack his another monster for game. He uses srh, receives no damage and finish you next turn.
Nah, Realm. I just make that example because you make econ take after your opp. activate SRH example. You don't have to repeat your example again for me. It's just that people can make any support example if you want to say one card is better, I'm anti-comparing of yours. Just look at your own previous post.
Let me clarify myself more. I'm not anti-support side of yours. It's just that when I see your example it's too 'econ better than srh' side. Most of cases, econ is better for swarming side. SRH is better for anti same type swarming such as VS Naturia. Who activate later to counter often have more advantage (as our example) otherwise why he activate it.
Obviously, econ is the better choice here. You can do alot with that card, stall, OTK, set something up. Heck even the conditions make it better.. and what is that anony tamking about. Stealing a monster is not ok, but killing it with a spell is? It's the same thing lmao. You didn't beat it with athe monster either.. what are you guys talking about :s