I'd love Canadia, Floodgate, Wall of Disruption and Drowning to all be limited-to-3, since none of them are super-problematic on their own (maybe excepting Canadia), but are obnoxious in combination.
Wonder if Sphere Kuriboh will remain untouched or not.
I feel like large reason they're even going to do a limited-to-3 is stall decks in general. Wall and Drowning make sense due to that. (I also wouldn't be surprised if they put something like Lava Golem or Swords Woman on there to hit the burn-based stall decks as well.)
I do like this idea; limit those meta-making traps to a new tier of limited; only three allowed in the deck. The downside of this is that to make it any form of impactful, konami is gonna have to throw the limited 3 sticker on a lot of other things as well so it feels like a nerf.
Why do you guys need all of these cards limited just to win? It's one thing to hope for one or two, but a big list like that is otp. Plenty of players are doing well without all of this.
stall is not the problem.the main problem is op summons and effects from monster like rb.i only use one of floodgate and 1 canadia.dont use drowning anymore in burn decks(which not even stall) the only stall is aroma basicly. i use a burn deck
shame that they only limit cards so that they will buy new ones and not because of game balance.yeah i faced a guy who use 4 floodgates and i almost won.
whats the point in offering p2w material and suddenly limiting it rendering it useless or some of them so wasted money.thats a ripoff.im not p2w and i hate those but thats pure bs.say it before it will be limited so they can buy that amount.
Anoymous
Silent
