I am suprised that in the comment section are only a few angry posts about ho... | Onomat: deck recipe [Aug 15] - YuGiOh! Duel Links

Onomat: deck recipe [Aug 15]

Anonymous

I am suprised that in the comment section are only a few angry posts about how op is this deck. On the other hand there are tons of cry babies in bewd, thunder dragon, shiranui, harpie, cydra threads. Why this? Imo, because everyone can make this deck in 1 day with 20$ and easily hit kog and as it seems everyone is happy with this status quo. Well, I am not. This deck is becoming really 🔥 in ladder, when 80% are onomats. Hope they treat them well in next banlist.

MangakaJ96

What changes would you consider to nerf Onomats?

<< Anonymous(MangakaJ96)

Anoymous

Make the skill lock you into summoning only utopia monsters or monsters with those weird sounds in their name (gagaga, gogo and such)

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

Totally agree. Your extra deck should have only these monsters utopia, gagaga etc.

<< Anonymous

MangakaJ96

Seeing as though there are mediocre Onomat monsters and that Utopia xyzs are decent at best in DL as of now, I doubt Konami would go for that idea (at least until they release the good Utopia monsters).

Personally, I think nerfing the skill to once per duel is a better idea atm.

<< Anonymous(MangakaJ96)

MangakaJ96

* Mediocre Onomat Xyz monsters.

<< Anonymous(MangakaJ96)

MangakaJ96

Alternatively, hitting certain cards could help too.

<< Anonymous(MangakaJ96)

Anoymous

Digital bug and exe beetle to 1.

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

I do think it is easier now defeating Onomat, because Exa-Bettle. I have found myself on numerous occasions where I could've lose if opponent was just summoned Ptolemy/Bounzer, but they picked Exa-Bettle/Rhinosebus instead

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

doesn't matter if you could win 1 more from your 90% lose rate against otomat deck. What matter is they use it to beat other tier deck.

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

And they are cheap R cards that doesn't make konami much money anyway.

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

Rhinosebus is easier to avoid, even if you are an F2P. Because we still got 3 opt of effects to deal with it (monster/spell/trap), not like when facing Bounzer.

The only time I lose against Rhinosebus was the first time I met one; didn't read that it pierces defence lol

<< Anonymous

MangakaJ96

Konami bans cards when many people start using a deck or cards. Sometimes, they ban cards before a deck becomes too powerful like what happened to Lunalights before Tenki came in the pack.

<< Anonymous(MangakaJ96)

MangakaJ96

Not sure if Konami bans cards for those reasons all the time tho.

<< Anonymous(MangakaJ96)

Anoymous

So ban cards that has nothing to do with the archetype overall, punishing those who actually like to play Digi Bugs. Just ban some cards within the archetype or their skill not those tech cards which are part of weaker archetypes. I hated it when i played lightsworn deck and it got nerfed because of witchcrafters.

<< Anonymous

MangakaJ96

That's what happens when many people abuse cards and skills.

<< Anonymous(MangakaJ96)

Anoymous

Thats what happens when Konami release badly made cards. Those cards should had a restriction. XYZ specific monsters should needed a certain archetype monster and not just a monster. For example Photon Bouncer should needed 2 lvl6 photon or galaxy monsters, malevolent sin 2 insect monsters etc etc thus limiting the use of these cards to certain decks.

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

No, it's actually always the players' fault. Not Konami's.
They aren't a charity. That's why Konami is forced by players to release generic broken cards.
If people like you bought every cards, they wouldn't be forced to power creep all the time.

<< Anonymous

MangakaJ96

That restriction suggestion on Xyz is a horrible idea. It defeats the purpose of using them.

And even with those restrictions, someone is going to find another way to make a deck broken eventually.

<< Anonymous(MangakaJ96)

Anoymous

Like I said, it's always the player's fault. They should stop trying to be creative and just play cards the way Konami intended the latter to be used.

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

Oooohh, you mean Konami isn't at fault for making a creating a broken card like Levianeer? This card is being abused by thunder dragons because Konami made it broken. How can broken Levianeer be players fault?

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

Konami is not at fault by making/creating cards.

But, if those said cards are clearly being abused or creates unbalance play between players, and Konami didn't do anything to fix that, then that is a fault they are doing.

It should be creators job to make balance for all, not just sitting on piles of money while watching their players at each others throat.

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

balanced stuff doesn't sell well so konami keeps printing broken bs

<< Anonymous

MangakaJ96

I think that multiple people copying broken strategies lead to a lack of creativity...leading to Konami hitting cards.

<< Anonymous

MangakaJ96

And let's be honest. Yu-Gi-Oh isn't a well balanced game.

<< Anonymous

MangakaJ96

Idk about Konami not being at fault here...The company did make Red Eyes Black Dragoon exist in the OCG/TCG.