Content

Superalloy Beast Raptinus | Decks and Tips

Anonymous
"Cons You need at least 3 cards just to summon him." Yeah, no 🔥. Just like every other fusion. The minimum it takes is 3 cards regardless of the summon.
Anoymous
and that's why all fusions are bad, because you have to give up a lot of resources in order to summon them, it's a weakness all fusions have that causes them not to be used
<< Anonymous
Daemon Blitzkrieg
I hope you know that's the same for all the Special summons: Fusion, Ritual, Synchro, XYZ, even Pendulum. (+ Tribute Summons) They all require AT LEAST two other resources to even pull off, some 3, some even way more than that.
<< Anonymous(Daemon Blitzkrieg)
Anoymous
1: I love how you explicitly leave out Link Summons because they don't benefit your point(Some Links only require 1 card to summon)
2: It is a lot harder to gather your resources in Duel Links than it is in the TCG/OCG, even with Skills and half the Deck Size, so requiring a lot of resources means more in Duel Links

I agree with you that this card isn't bad for requiring resources though, but
<< Anonymous(Daemon Blitzkrieg)
Anoymous
cont..

Your logic is still kinda flawed
<< Anonymous
Daemon Blitzkrieg
Actually, believe it or not, its because I didn't even remember Link Summons was a thing. See some of the cards, don't have any of my own. And yea, half a normal deck is...idk, hindering? But its specifically designed that way with a different format in mind, so bringing that up helps no one and just forces one to focus on a few key cards rather than 10~20. If those are my flaws, I accept them -_-
<< Anonymous(Daemon Blitzkrieg)
Anoymous
I never said that having half the deck size was hindering, in fact I said the exact opposite.

Also how does bringing up Summoning methods that don't exist in Duel Links help but bringing up the difference in the ability to gather resources between Duel Links and the TCG/OCG not help?





<< Anonymous
Daemon Blitzkrieg
...yea, I'm starting to think you new bloods are doing this on purpose. Let's try this: Everything you THINK I said, try the inverse.
Now take this part literally: This original Con comment still makes no sense & the 1st Anon is right as the majority of Summon Methods demand at least 3 cards to pull off & that DOES NOT make Fusions bad because of it.

Anything else you wanna get off your chest?
<< Anonymous(Daemon Blitzkrieg)
Anoymous
Once again, you twisted my words. I never said that I thought requiring resources made a card bad, I only said that your logic was poor. But, now you are trying to tell me that I said that requiring resources does make a card bad.
<< Anonymous
Daemon Blitzkrieg
... -_-
"and that's why all fusions are bad, because you have to give up a lot of resources in order to summon them, it's a weakness all fusions have that causes them not to be used"

What is there to twist? Plz tell me because black & white ain't lying right here. Good luck twisting this btw & you have a good night.
<< Anonymous(Daemon Blitzkrieg)
Anoymous
-_-

I am not the Original Anonymous, and you clearly know this by saying "New Bloods" with an s and by saying "the 1st Anon".

Also you completely ignored this because it didn't fit your narrative:
"I agree with you that this card isn't bad for requiring resources though"
Anoymous
Gladiator Beasts only take 2 cards

Ranking

Comments (updated every hour)

inb4 some stupid brainless dumb FÛCK gets mad. The comment below was just a joke. Nothing ...
WHO ARE THE OWNERS AND HOW CAN I SUCK THEIR C0CKS?!!! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!...
Gx unlock Atticus rhodes unlock red eye dragon stage
777-929-298 Just because you are a human, don't think you can win easily.
> Go to the latest comments

Popular Decks

Popular Cards

QA

Another Game Site