I admit that I have lost more times than won against this deck. But I still think they went way too far with this newest nerf. It wasn't op before with the first one.
They were afraid of the deck coming back after the econ nerf. But CA was essentially a rogue deck in the current meta and the nerf was too much. I think they should have just straight limited petite to 1.
Well, Konami itself decided to semi-limit Hiro Shadow Scout beforehand due to fear of it being too powerful in the post-nerf meta... so I guess it makes sense for them.
Completely agree, they just nerfed it again by semi-limiting petit cyber angel. Now they're tier 3 and not even worth the grind it takes to get the necessary cards. You basically have to run 3 Saffira or the decks no good which is bs considering how difficult that is.
I kind of hate saying this, but it feels like they also did this because it was one deck where you could get almost everything for it from farming a legendary duelist.
It's still in the game as a potentially great tier 1.5 to 2 deck(especially if Fur Hires is removed). The problem is that Konami tries to make this deck too expensive to maintain to make players follow the meta game instead of playing Anti-Meta. The same followed with Aliens with E-Con, and Amazoness with Onslaught(though it still manages to survive).
Anonymous
Mah boi
