DD tower is such a time consuming event, 100% completion rate really takes a ... (2page) | D.D. Tower: Sacred Light Dimension Event - YuGiOh! Duel Links

<< Anonymous

Trepanated Skull

Again, such a paltry response. The element of time involved, whether concrete or not, is not the point. The basis of comparison between thw two events, is not to to assess which one is more time-consuming, but as to what attribution does the respective events make you waste time.

<< Anonymous

Trepanated Skull

First, the claim here is that if the two events are equally attributed as time-consuming, then as to what nature does it relies on? on the basis of DDT event alone, it may be the case that it's hard to finish, grindy, etc. Suddenly, when...

<< Anonymous

Trepanated Skull

... put in juxtaposition with the Tabletop event, one might see that the nature of time-consuming facet of both these events does NOT really weights similarly. One, was mechanically made to be easy but inherently detached to the mechanica of the game while the other one, is conjectured as a prime feature of the game. Go figure which is which.

<< Anonymous

Trepanated Skull

Duh. I just reiterated the tautology that is inherently in your question. It has nothing to do with whether I can compare with Konami or not. God, this is why I don't like arguing outside my academe.. everything needs to be clarified in the most foundational sense because most others won't really match your context nor the "so-called wavelength"

<< Anonymous(Trepanated Skull)

Anoymous

I think it was clear that my initial post was about the event being time consuming or am I wrong?

<< Anonymous(Trepanated Skull)

Anoymous

the idea of dice battles is not part of dueling but it's part of the game because this game unlike other games have other elements to it than just dueling and hey it's meant to be a part of the event so calling it a stupid idea or waste of time is your mere opinion.

<< Anonymous(Trepanated Skull)

Anoymous

in this argument you have to always answer why Konami did this or else what's the point if you try to explain things without reasoning konami's decision, I'm not comparing you to Konami or whatever I'm got saying that tour answer didn't justify Konami's decision

<< Anonymous

Trepanated Skull

Indeed. Without comparison, I stand by my claim that DD tower is grindy, and isn't newbie friendly. Now, next scenario, DD tower in comparison to tabletop, within this context DD tower is not that time-consuming based NOT on element of 'concrete' time involved, but on the nature as to how time is wasted or consumpted thereafter. Simple as that.

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

other than*

<< Anonymous(Trepanated Skull)

Anoymous

you actually gain experience by doing dice battles and gaining experience is helpful to continue playing so you can get more coins so it's not 100% a waste of time, it's just like missions, they both help you with the lottry, one is directly and the other is indirectly

<< Anonymous

Trepanated Skull

No one called the dice event stupid. The argument is not to objectively assess that it is a wasted element, but the question, "why is DD tower event time-consuming when there's a dice event that existed before?"

<< Anonymous(Trepanated Skull)

Anoymous

because dice battles take less time than doing missions, way less time
that's alk

<< Anonymous(Trepanated Skull)

Anoymous

because dice battles take less time than doing missions, way less time
that's all

<< Anonymous

Trepanated Skull

You yourself, answered the question above. IF THE DICE FEATURE IS SUPPOSED TO BE A PART OF AN EVENT, OR THE GAME ITSELF, HOW COME SWITCHING OF DECKS IS TIME CONSUMING, GIVEN THE SAME ATTRIBUTION. Do you get the context?

<< Anonymous

Trepanated Skull

Your line of thought is too focused on the dice event being onherently easy to do that it justifies a bit of wasting time. No one argued agaons this. The basis of argument, is always in the context of the juxtaposition between the two mechanical events, and how come the other one is allowed to be labeled as time-consuming when it's a more atributive aspect of the game.

NOTHING ELSE.I'm done here

<< Anonymous(Trepanated Skull)

Trepanated Skull

No one argued against* this

<< Anonymous(Trepanated Skull)

Anoymous

I clearly mentioned that this event is time consuming without mentioning anything about being a waste of time or any element of the event being waste of time, stage 2 KC for example is very time consuming but it's not a waste of time for many players, you got the difference ?

<< Anonymous(Trepanated Skull)

Anoymous

It's not about the idea of switching decks but the thing is you need to REPEATEDLY switch decks or add cards and that's the thing that makes the event time consuming

<< Anonymous

Trepanated Skull

that is not part of the above context, as a cross-section between three events or elements is a different thing already. I'm only here to infer that DD event being time consuming is flawed in a 'logical sense' by basis of said comparison. If you wish to argue about differential probabilities or intersubjective consensus, feel frew to find a partner. my argument is syntax-based, nothing more,

<< Anonymous

Trepanated Skull

nothing less.

<< Anonymous(Trepanated Skull)

Anoymous

I will answer your first question.
Is dueling a part of the game? Of course it is
KC cup stage 2 is all about dueling but it's so time consuming and everyone agrees that stage 2 is all about the Time you play given that everyone is a good player with average luck.
A thing being part of the game has nothing to do with it being time consuming or not

<< Anonymous(Trepanated Skull)

Anoymous

It's not really different since the 3 events share the element of grinding

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

I just mentioned the kc cup to explain to you why is DD tower is relatively time consuming compared to Tabletop, that's all

<< Anonymous

Trepanated Skull

Anyone know what is heuristically right. That an hour is longer than a minute. You may be thinking, whoa this dude can't understand how much it takes so much time to create and switch decks, than to roll a dice". If this not your assumption you would have gotten my point a long time ago.

<< Anonymous

Trepanated Skull

But since you continued on, I will assume that I'm being underestimated and severely confused here. That's why I repeatedly stressed the inportance of the "context" of any argument. You can back read if you want, everything was bared there already.

<< Anonymous

Trepanated Skull

No qualms on your Kc cup or those heuristically-proven matters-of-fact. If that is all there is to my argument, why would I even bother to continue. I acknowledged your heuristic facts since it's the obvious ones, but I'm disappointed that mine wasn't understood from a syntax and logical standpoint. Oh well, it's life. Bye.

Anoymous

Don't do 100%, the icon isnt worth.

<< Anonymous(Trepanated Skull)

Anoymous

I didn't actually underestimate you at all, in fact you have all my respect, I was acting stupid at first but when I realized you were serious I stopped, you may want to have some higher level sophisticated kind of argument but I like to be simple and clear so everyone can understand

<< Anonymous(Trepanated Skull)

Anoymous

I did understand your point but I ignored some of them because they had nothing to do with time consumption, you talked about some stuff being a waste of time and many other things but those things has nothing to do with "time consumption" that's why I didn't reply on everything you mentioned so don't get the wrong idea

<< Anonymous(Trepanated Skull)

Anoymous

Perhaps it was the way I talked that made you felt being understimed.
I'm sorry if you felt that way,I really didn't mean it tho.