I personally like having unfair advantages, makes winning easier and I think winning is fun, please do not try to control how others have fun, it is something subjective.
i use fur hire cause it is cheap. i want to make other decks that would be good too but are expensive and the problem of the game is the incosistent way to obtain cards. you can't craft/trade them all or a daily quest that gives you 100 gems for example. they could make the cards of 5 boxes and earlier tradable with jewels or just trade them all for more jewels than they value them now.
"Learn to play people.
Is not that difficult to tech some cards" Yeah cause having to tech 6 to 8 cards to coutner just one deck is knowing how to play
"When did Canadias, Floodgate, and WoD become dead draws?"
-Parasite infestation burn
-Ojama Go
-Temple burn
-Extra extra stall
-Cyber Angels
-Call of the Archfiend
-SSA
-Geargia laughs at WoD and Canadia
What have you been playing since Abbyss Encounters? Gold rank unga bunga with 3 Axe Raiders? LMAO
I still have a recording of the time someone ojama locked me and I kept setting WoD and made them deckout. So ojama wasn't a good choice in this arguement.
That's one example. Fur Hires are stupidly consistent with beat yet even without beat, cards like wiz that negate spell/trap or Dyna that banishes the gy dominate the meta
Not only that, but the FH is easy to complete since most of the cards are from one box. Meanwhile, its counters are difficult to come by. Wall of D is an SR card. Candida and Floodgate are URs. Both are from different boxes and you will probably need multiple copies. Plus, you need to sacrifice deck space for the chance of facing against FH. And there's no guarantee that you will beat them either.
Anoymous
^