They weakened some fur cards but it's still the fur 🔥 cup as predicted. It's understandable to see furs at high DVs because it's where the strongest decks are, but Fur Hire in like, DV6 or so is 🔥. By the second day they should be at least DV10.
What are you talking about? Fur Hire sucks against most other top tier decks now. That's why they're in low DVs. If anything, it's the Amazoness/UA cup.
Fully optimal fur at Rookie 1... what the hell is wrong with the world. They can still compete and win because 🔥 Seal and Mayhem keeps adding Dyna back over and over it's bizarre.
The thing is they confuse a common cold with 🔥. 🔥 decks do not include all meta decks...or even Tier 1 for that matter. 🔥 decks are strictly Tier 0 material, something above the power of normal competitive play. There's a reason they compare them to 🔥, they are aggressive and extremely difficult to beat...it's something above a normal affliction.
There are other types that might fit the description: extremely consistent decks (CA) or extremely sacky decks (Sylvan). Cyber Angel's consistency was too good and Sylvan's excavation mechanic was too advantageous for a 20 card min deck. These exploits give unfair advantage and would make them fit the term 🔥, even though Sylvans were not Tier 0. (CA was though)
Anonymous
Saladfingers
