Content

Thorn of Malice | Deck and Rulings

Aki fanboy
Eh, if it didn't reduce attack or it allowed you to attack twice it'd be worth it. As it is it's just a hard Neg 1 that doesn't deal with any of your opponent's cards. Not terrible, just not worth playing.
Anoymous
the opponents monster loses attack
<< Anonymous
Anoymous
its meant to fill his board n mke his monsters o def n attack then 🔥 him w piercing dmg
Anoymous
I like its symbolic meaning. Black Rose is portrayed as a brutal dragon, hurting everyone who comes near it, and this furthers that motif by leaving its enemies on the field to torture.
Anoymous
It's mostly designed to combo with Rose Tentacles to attack the same monster repeatedly, but it's not a terrible card in general.
Anoymous
Notably, it allows your other monster to destroy the weakened monster.

Which is nice when you also control a monster whose effect only activates if it destroyed a monster in battle, but is too weak to destroy opponent's monster, so you can have the equipped monster weaken it first.

Ranking

Comments (updated every hour)

Never change, Brandon. Never change. You are the most weird bot here. I appreciate your existence
Did you fall for a crypto scam and are looking for a way to cope with? Look no further! I have th...
Sounds as legit as the shady @@@ dealer I see sometimes after nightfall in the park V
You must have added monster(s) other than "Performapal" monsters, "Magician" ...
> Go to the latest comments

Popular Decks

Popular Cards

QA

Another Game Site