Content

Thorn of Malice | Deck and Rulings

Aki fanboy
Eh, if it didn't reduce attack or it allowed you to attack twice it'd be worth it. As it is it's just a hard Neg 1 that doesn't deal with any of your opponent's cards. Not terrible, just not worth playing.
Anoymous
the opponents monster loses attack
<< Anonymous
Anoymous
its meant to fill his board n mke his monsters o def n attack then 🔥 him w piercing dmg
Anoymous
I like its symbolic meaning. Black Rose is portrayed as a brutal dragon, hurting everyone who comes near it, and this furthers that motif by leaving its enemies on the field to torture.
Anoymous
It's mostly designed to combo with Rose Tentacles to attack the same monster repeatedly, but it's not a terrible card in general.
Anoymous
Notably, it allows your other monster to destroy the weakened monster.

Which is nice when you also control a monster whose effect only activates if it destroyed a monster in battle, but is too weak to destroy opponent's monster, so you can have the equipped monster weaken it first.

Ranking

Comments (updated every hour)

My good ol buddy. Still get wins with it.
I wonder how much this still gets use even now.
It was going to happen sooner or later. I never used the card that much though
Well I eventually joined the dark side, and put this in my deck. :P
> Go to the latest comments

Popular Decks

Popular Cards

QA

Another Game Site