Content

Share the Pain | Deck and Rulings

Anonymous
"for no effect"... isn't forcing the opponent to tribute a monster the effect?
Anoymous
Yes, normally forcing the opponent to tribute a monster IS a effect.
That's why this card specifies that "for no effect". It makes this card more valuable.
Anoymous
"For no effect" here means no effect can be activated due to the tributed monster leaving the field.
<< Anonymous
Anoymous
wrong, it means opponent's monster being tributed is a cost. Not an effect.
This card has no effect, so banishing navigation to negate this spell is useless because you can't negate a cost
<< Anonymous
Anoymous
a cost for what? then what is the effect?
<< Anonymous
Anoymous
For no effect means, that it's not a tribute for a tribute summon or ritual summon. That's all.

Further, tributing your monster is a cost. The effect is that your opponent tributes a monster too.
<< Anonymous
Anoymous
Just like lava golem.
Shien cannot negate this card because he can't negate cost.
<< Anonymous
Xeledur
Guess thats wrong, cause Shien negates activation of spell cards, so this one as well ;-).
<< Anonymous(Xeledur)
Anoymous
but you pay the cost before activation, so shien is still tributed even if he manages to negate the effect:
"for no effect".

in that case, a monster whose effect is "when tributed do this" will still be activable because shien negated (for no effect)

the opponent will still have to tribute 1 monster for the cost.
<< Anonymous
Anoymous
You tributing your monster is the cost; tributing your opponent´s is the effect.

In that particular case, you´d sacrifice a monster to trigger the Spell; then, the opposing Shien would negate it.

Ranking

Comments (updated every hour)

People only subscribe to your channel because they laugh at you. You're a joke and you'...
I know it's early, but I really hope they add the independent Ai, really like @ignisters
> Go to the latest comments

Popular Decks

Popular Cards

QA

Another Game Site