It will hurt in the long run if Komoney(or is it Konami?) nerfs Fur Hires like it did with Sylvans and Aliens. I learned this the hard way during the Sylvan Pre-banlist Era,you will be stuck with an anti-meta deck that's more costly to maintain against the evolving meta. For this reason, I've gone a long way in the world of Duel Links pvp, but nowhere near KOG.
(Part 2) All I can do now is try rerolling for techs from event gems and research and research, while giving advice to players from the results of the research. But the fact remains, that planning Anti-meta in the long run may be better than using a Tier 0 meta deck.
Except Furs won't get a permanent nerf there are still cards that have yet to be put in/might be in the future that can boost it right back to tier 0 even if it gets a heavy handed hit so considered it more an investment with furs then other decks that basically have all there cores in circulation right now
Makes sense, though the archetype consists of only 3 spells/traps and all others are monsters due to it being the antithesis of Brandish Maiden in the OCG. It's highly unlikely from my point of view,that fur hires may get to tier 0 again in the future,(maybe this is CA again, but the cards cannot be substituted), and the addition of Rafale and Bravo might again prompt Konami to nerf it.
Feel free to take my views and story with a grain of salt, but this comes from the point of view of a researcher. If you have researched the OCG/Duel Links carefully and found better research, you might want to notify me so we can put an end to this argument. That is all. Let's prove this scientifically and with research.
You being that 🔥 over a single deck that's doing it meta rounds is proof that this game is not for you if ya ain't noticed yet there is always a meta and it's always hated on by brain dead apes that can't get beyond it.
All archetypes consist of a few spell or traps (Except protos) and monster cards I mean it's like saying a decks made of cards its basic stuff, Your point of view mine is different that's the thing you have just as much of a chance of being wrong as I do, of course Konami will nerf it again it's how they keep links running you nerf then add in new cards to fill the meta void and their pocket.
Feel free to disbelieve me, but this is what I concluded from part of my research. I don't expect anyone to believe me. I just note that certain decks have great core engines that can be adjusted to completely suit a balanced meta. And I mentioned that this is quite a pattern we have seen years back in the OCG where archetype antithesis exist and it's very likely that they will nerf it to the dust
and it means that if they nerf the core, they can become completely unplayable and also Konami happens to introduce new cards and not support the old archetype. That's what I interpret the meta succession pattern as. At this point I don't even know if I am arguing with an Anonymous that is pro or against FH as the ultimate deck everyone should spend gems on. That is all.
Sorry if I offended anyone in voicing my highly unconventional and controversial views on my studies of (OCG)DM and DL on a macro scale. You could disbelieve me, but after all, everyone has the right to speak their mind in the internet.
Anonymous
Yang
