Yes, but losing isn't fun... and to win you need to play one of those annoying meta deck. Do you see the problem? If winning is the only way for those people to have fun, then they *must* play those meta decks in order to have fun. This game isn't about player expression or playing with your favorite monster, it is all about victory. *Channels Dark Zane*
I agree with Aquablast, people gravitate towards the same performant decks eventually, thats what META(Most Effective Tactic Available) is. The internet only accelerates the discovery of such decks, so it is not entirely the game's fault(what they release is their fault although this is planned). All players can do is not get attached to their decks and adapt to the pvp climate.
The problem is, that those 'counters' are already the meta decks.
SB own most other decks as its banish card is superior to everything. ONly very fast decks can compete here or?
Amazoness, while enable banishing, it can be countered either by backrow and/or monster removal or just plain damage.
Sylvan... the 🔥 from hell. Only 'luck' dependent. Some of those are even run good with spells/trap
I didn't encounter other decks, that were as strong as those 3.
Anki seem to be dependent on luck as well to OTK or to not get stopped afterwards.
SS was only 2 times used against me.
scumbag decks
Aquablast
