Lmao, it isn't unbeatable but people try to convince that with a simple reason: popularity means tier 0.
These guys must ve played sylvan pre-banlist, cried a river and 🔥ed every deck afterwards.
Part 2. This is not because there “popular”. It’s because there way too consistent. It’s like they don’t brick. Add beat down and boom you lost. Yes decks can beat them but there try to counter them. Or there already (in my opinion) OP decks that needs that need more nerfing, like amazons. Again tier 0 to me is most decks lose to. Why should I invest into the new, and the next box set?
No, Amazoness work so bad when go against Fur Hire. Before Hey, Trunade! used in FH, Amazoness can win with good draw or FH player is really bad.
Now it is one side battle.
I'm have both Amazoness and FH deck. But I'm not really sure about other meta deck.
Also, I don't think Sylvan was Tier 0. They were strong but nowhere near FH at the moment.
True, we could counter sylvans just by negating their excavations or key monster effects, Fur Hires simply have no readily available counter and even Aliens or Amazoness could counter Sylvans due to simply being given a simple tech card, but unfortunately this is not the case with Fur Hires. When experimented by Duel Links Meta, Fur Hires dominate every deck that counter them completely.
Anonymous
Ren
