Let the players vote for the banlist! | Duel Links Forbidden & Limited card [Feb 27] - YuGiOh! Duel Links

Anoymous

This will keep the game alive for sure.

Anoymous

OP probably wants a banlist that includes hundreds or thousands of cards.

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

OP is right, public voting makes it fairer.

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

Probably not, with how sheep the community is I can already imagine the manipulation to get fair decks limited or for degenerate decks to avoid the banlist just because a popular baituber likes the deck.

Like how dlm made a whole campaign to convince everyone BE wasn't that good and that it didn't need a nerf, and a lot of people ate and believed that bs.

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

Exactly DLM crew of paid clown meta fiesta manipulators are the worst scam of the internet, backed by tons of idiot sheep beta kids and noliferz asians

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

Fair decks? How many of the decks are "fair" in this game? Cards of Consonance, Star Seraph, Karma Cut or Malevolent Sin? Invoker, Harpie, Lunalight or TD? Cyber Style, Destiny Draw, Level Augmentation or Onomatoplay? Can cers are everywhere, lucky for you Karakuri, Crystron, Shiranui, Noble Knights & Despacito were gone for now.

Anoymous

"Fair" is a relative term that people often oversimplify. In terms of the meta it could constitute anywhere from Cloudians to Tellarknights, and people would still hit certain cards out of spite rather than how it impacts the meta. Putting it in players' hands will vary and fluctuate. It's a messy process, and it will never be perfect, but as the old saying goes, "if it isn't broke, don't fix it."

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

^^if you think the game is that broken then w t f are you still playing?

Anoymous

I don't think it's broken, at least not too terribly. I do however think it was scummy to release the F.A.s only to scapegoat them for blue eyes like we'll see at the end of the KC cup, though.

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

hah do you remember how 2 weeks ago blue eyes wasn't good? that it bricked a lot? that it was overrated? lol just as the 3rd comment said. like he ll i want sheeps like that deciding the banlist

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

You can't keep the game 100% fair:
A BE deck would think digital bugs is a fair deck but what does a digital bug deck think about BE? That it's broken af

The moment konami decided to give cards different effects or stats they scr ewed the game, but what if all cards did exactly the same? The game would have di ed in weeks because it would be boring af

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

Konami's directive is more like:

"Don't fix anything, these dogs always come back anyways"

Anoymous

We saw that when Invoked was released and the skittered around the issue of Aelister for about a year. About the only time I remember them fixing an issue quickly was Sprite FTK, but you'd think they would have known better than putting all the bamboo swords in a single box.

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

They only move when their profit is involved, how come they swiftly (it only took them like 3 days) limited R cards like boxer veil and magic crusher but yet haven't done a thing about this FA nonsense

<< Anonymous

Anoymous

Yes, talking about profit>>> just start banning more and more card then people will surely buy new packs. Banlist will increase revenue and that's the fact. 50% discount on packs will attract more new players buying older boxes for staples.